lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121174213.GA31247@lst.de>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:42:13 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Implement dma_[un]map_resource()

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:46:22AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Instead of having two tiny wrappers I'd just revert
> > 964f2311a6862f1fbcc044d0828ad90030928b7f if we need to pass a real
> > physical address now.
> 
> Ok, I can resubmit this with that cleanup. Should I do it in two commits
> (1 revert + 1 new) or is one commit that just restores the original
> helper fine?

I think a single commit is fine.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ