linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] pwm-regulator: reduce noise on EPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:55:47 +0100
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, thierry.reding@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] pwm-regulator: reduce noise on EPROBE_DEFER

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 8:18 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 07:37:22PM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > pwm-regulator can be a bit noisy during boot.
> >
> > One example are the 32-bit Amlogic SoCs when using
> > multi_v7_defconfig (which has CONFIG_REGULATOR_PWM=y and
>
> Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
> that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
> if it's administrative stuff.  This reduces mail volume and ensures that
> any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
> lost.
noted - sorry for the noise.

the patch description already contains all relevant information, so I
won't re-send the patch.
only the KernelCI link is not included because I'm not sure how long
it's valid (instead the description includes all relevant information
which also can be seen in the KernelCI link)


Regards
Martin