lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121210116.GZ4087@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:01:16 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, osalvador@...e.de,
        catalin.marinas@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hotplug: invalid PFNs from pfn_to_online_page()

On Mon 21-01-19 15:04:35, Qian Cai wrote:
> On an arm64 ThunderX2 server, the first kmemleak scan would crash [1]
> with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS=y due to page_to_nid() found a pfn that is
> not directly mapped (MEMBLOCK_NOMAP). Hence, the page->flags is
> uninitialized.
> 
> This is due to the commit 9f1eb38e0e11 ("mm, kmemleak: little
> optimization while scanning") starts to use pfn_to_online_page() instead
> of pfn_valid(). However, in the CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y case,
> pfn_to_online_page() does not call memblock_is_map_memory() while
> pfn_valid() does.
> 
> Historically, the commit 68709f45385a ("arm64: only consider memblocks
> with NOMAP cleared for linear mapping") causes pages marked as nomap
> being no long reassigned to the new zone in memmap_init_zone() by
> calling __init_single_page().
> 
> Since the commit 2d070eab2e82 ("mm: consider zone which is not fully
> populated to have holes") introduced pfn_to_online_page() and was
> designed to return a valid pfn only, but it is clearly broken on arm64.

I still have some problem with this paragraph because it doesn't really
reflect the documentation as explained already
(http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190121183613.GY4087@dhcp22.suse.cz). Calling
pfn_to_online_page on an invalid pfn is clearly underdocumented but
that doesn't make the API broken. Error prone, I do agree with.

> Therefore, let pfn_to_online_page() calls pfn_valid_within(), so it can
> handle nomap thanks to the commit f52bb98f5ade ("arm64: mm: always
> enable CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE"), while it will be optimized away on
> architectures where have no HOLES_IN_ZONE.
> 
> [1]
> [  102.195320] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000006
> [  102.204113] Mem abort info:
> [  102.206921]   ESR = 0x96000005
> [  102.209997]   Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> [  102.215926]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
> [  102.218993]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> [  102.222150] Data abort info:
> [  102.225047]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005
> [  102.228887]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
> [  102.231866] user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = (____ptrval____)
> [  102.238572] [0000000000000006] pgd=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000
> [  102.245448] Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] SMP
> [  102.264062] CPU: 60 PID: 1408 Comm: kmemleak Not tainted 5.0.0-rc2+ #8
> [  102.280403] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
> [  102.280409] pc : page_mapping+0x24/0x144
> [  102.280415] lr : __dump_page+0x34/0x3dc
> [  102.292923] sp : ffff00003a5cfd10
> [  102.296229] x29: ffff00003a5cfd10 x28: 000000000000802f
> [  102.301533] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000277d00
> [  102.306835] x25: ffff000010791f56 x24: ffff7fe000000000
> [  102.312138] x23: ffff000010772f8b x22: ffff00001125f670
> [  102.317442] x21: ffff000011311000 x20: ffff000010772f8b
> [  102.322747] x19: fffffffffffffffe x18: 0000000000000000
> [  102.328049] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> [  102.333352] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: ffff802698b19600
> [  102.338654] x13: ffff802698b1a200 x12: ffff802698b16f00
> [  102.343956] x11: ffff802698b1a400 x10: 0000000000001400
> [  102.349260] x9 : 0000000000000001 x8 : ffff00001121a000
> [  102.354563] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000102c53b8
> [  102.359868] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000003
> [  102.365173] x3 : 0000000000000100 x2 : 0000000000000000
> [  102.370476] x1 : ffff000010772f8b x0 : ffffffffffffffff
> [  102.375782] Process kmemleak (pid: 1408, stack limit = 0x(____ptrval____))
> [  102.382648] Call trace:
> [  102.385091]  page_mapping+0x24/0x144
> [  102.388659]  __dump_page+0x34/0x3dc
> [  102.392140]  dump_page+0x28/0x4c
> [  102.395363]  kmemleak_scan+0x4ac/0x680
> [  102.399106]  kmemleak_scan_thread+0xb4/0xdc
> [  102.403285]  kthread+0x12c/0x13c
> [  102.406509]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> [  102.410080] Code: d503201f f9400660 36000040 d1000413 (f9400661)
> [  102.416357] ---[ end trace 4d4bd7f573490c8e ]---
> [  102.420966] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> [  102.426293] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> [  102.431830] Kernel Offset: disabled
> [  102.435311] CPU features: 0x002,20000c38
> [  102.439223] Memory Limit: none
> [  102.442384] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---
> 
> Fixes: 2d070eab2e82 ("mm: consider zone which is not fully populated to
> have holes")

And I still maintain that the Fixes tag is misleading at best. I would
say that the above issue is caused by 9f1eb38e0e11 ("mm, kmemleak:
little optimization while scanning"). Or do you know of any other bug
caused by the newly added API before then?

> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>

Other than that, I do agree with the change
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

> ---
> 
> v2: update the changelog; keep the bound check; use pfn_valid_within().
> 
>  include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 17 +++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index 07da5c6c5ba0..cdeecd9bd87e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -21,14 +21,15 @@ struct vmem_altmap;
>   * walkers which rely on the fully initialized page->flags and others
>   * should use this rather than pfn_valid && pfn_to_page
>   */
> -#define pfn_to_online_page(pfn)				\
> -({							\
> -	struct page *___page = NULL;			\
> -	unsigned long ___nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);	\
> -							\
> -	if (___nr < NR_MEM_SECTIONS && online_section_nr(___nr))\
> -		___page = pfn_to_page(pfn);		\
> -	___page;					\
> +#define pfn_to_online_page(pfn)					   \
> +({								   \
> +	struct page *___page = NULL;				   \
> +	unsigned long ___nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);		   \
> +								   \
> +	if (___nr < NR_MEM_SECTIONS && online_section_nr(___nr) && \
> +	    pfn_valid_within(pfn))				   \
> +		___page = pfn_to_page(pfn);			   \
> +	___page;						   \
>  })
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.17.2 (Apple Git-113)
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ