[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121213028.GB28620@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:30:28 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
arve@...roid.com, tkjos@...roid.com, maco@...roid.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, christian@...uner.io,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dma-buf: add support for mapping with dma mapping
attributes
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:20:42PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> I have left this to clients, but if they own the buffer they can have the
> knowledge as to whether CPU access is needed in that use case (example for
> post-processing).
That is an API design which the user is more likely to get wrong than
right and thus does not pass the smell test.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists