linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] livepatch: Handle failing allocation of shadow variables in the selftest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190121224012.GB8766@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:40:12 -0500
From:   Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] livepatch: Handle failing allocation of shadow
 variables in the selftest

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:17:18PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Do not dereference pointers to the shadow variables when either
> klp_shadow_alloc() or klp_shadow_get() fail.
> 
> There is no need to check the other locations explicitly. The test
> would fail if any allocation fails. And the existing messages, printed
> during the test, provide enough information to debug eventual problems.
> 

I didn't run the test under those failing conditions, but at looking at
the code, I think it would simply skip the "expected <conditions> found"
and the test script would complain about not seeing that msg.

Would it be easier to just bite the bullet and verify sv[0-4] at their
allocation sites?  Then later uses (ie, the sv3 dereference that
Miroslav spotted at the bottom) or new code wouldn't fall through the
cracks.

-- Joe