linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 3/4] coresight: etm4x: Add support to enable ETMv4.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cc71cfa9-8a11-9356-ac41-e27564a9f7b4@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:18:36 +0530
From:   Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To:     Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/4] coresight: etm4x: Add support to enable ETMv4.2


On 1/18/2019 5:52 PM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> SDM845 has ETMv4.2 and can use the existing etm4x driver.
> But the current etm driver checks only for ETMv4.0 and
> errors out for other etm4x versions. This patch adds this
> missing support to enable SoC's with ETMv4x to use same
> driver by checking only the ETM architecture major version
> number.
>
> Without this change, we get below error during etm probe:
>
> / # dmesg | grep etm
> [    6.660093] coresight-etm4x: probe of 7040000.etm failed with error -22
> [    6.666902] coresight-etm4x: probe of 7140000.etm failed with error -22
> [    6.673708] coresight-etm4x: probe of 7240000.etm failed with error -22
> [    6.680511] coresight-etm4x: probe of 7340000.etm failed with error -22
> [    6.687313] coresight-etm4x: probe of 7440000.etm failed with error -22
> [    6.694113] coresight-etm4x: probe of 7540000.etm failed with error -22
> [    6.700914] coresight-etm4x: probe of 7640000.etm failed with error -22
> [    6.707717] coresight-etm4x: probe of 7740000.etm failed with error -22
>
> With this change, etm probe is successful:
>
> / # dmesg | grep coresight
> [    6.659198] coresight-etm4x 7040000.etm: CPU0: ETM v4.2 initialized
> [    6.665848] coresight-etm4x 7140000.etm: CPU1: ETM v4.2 initialized
> [    6.672493] coresight-etm4x 7240000.etm: CPU2: ETM v4.2 initialized
> [    6.679129] coresight-etm4x 7340000.etm: CPU3: ETM v4.2 initialized
> [    6.685770] coresight-etm4x 7440000.etm: CPU4: ETM v4.2 initialized
> [    6.692403] coresight-etm4x 7540000.etm: CPU5: ETM v4.2 initialized
> [    6.699024] coresight-etm4x 7640000.etm: CPU6: ETM v4.2 initialized
> [    6.705646] coresight-etm4x 7740000.etm: CPU7: ETM v4.2 initialized
>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 2 +-
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> index 53e2fb6e86f6..93d5f1f3145e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static void etm4_os_unlock(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>   
>   static bool etm4_arch_supported(u8 arch)
>   {
> -	switch (arch) {
> +	switch (arch >> 4) {


While this looks good, from what it looks like arch is a combination of 
major version
minor version. So, will it be better to masks, and shifts macros instead 
of a magic
number shift.
But, frankly it's upto Mathieu to decide the readability of this. So, I 
leave it to him.

Thanks
Vivek

>   	case ETM_ARCH_V4:
>   		break;
>   	default:
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> index 52786e9d8926..05d4bd330881 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
>   #define ETM_MAX_RES_SEL			16
>   #define ETM_MAX_SS_CMP			8
>   
> -#define ETM_ARCH_V4			0x40
> +#define ETM_ARCH_V4			0x4
>   #define ETMv4_SYNC_MASK			0x1F
>   #define ETM_CYC_THRESHOLD_MASK		0xFFF
>   #define ETM_CYC_THRESHOLD_DEFAULT       0x100