[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121131336.GC3852@krava>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:13:36 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] perf report: Display s390 diagnostic counter sets
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 07:18:14PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:00:53AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/python-ext-sources
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/python-ext-sources
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ util/parse-branch-options.c
> > util/rblist.c
> > util/counts.c
> > util/print_binary.c
> > +util/s390-sample-raw.c
> > util/strlist.c
> > util/trace-event.c
> > ../lib/rbtree.c
>
> hi,
> this change breaks the python module:
>
> >>> import perf
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> ImportError: ./perf.so: undefined symbol: color_fprintf
>
> changelog doesn't say anything about python related change
I made some chenages and movedthat raw sample code
under s390.. which cured the python module, but
I haven't tested it on s390.
Could you please check if code in here works for you:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
perf/s390
if it works, I'll post it
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists