linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.20 066/111] powerpc/tm: Limit TM code inside PPC_TRANSACTIONAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190121122503.764750006@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:43:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@...chmal.in-ulm.de>,
        Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 066/111] powerpc/tm: Limit TM code inside PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>

commit 897bc3df8c5aebb54c32d831f917592e873d0559 upstream.

Commit e1c3743e1a20 ("powerpc/tm: Set MSR[TS] just prior to recheckpoint")
moved a code block around and this block uses a 'msr' variable outside of
the CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM, however the 'msr' variable is declared
inside a CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM block, causing a possible error when
CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTION_MEM is not defined.

	error: 'msr' undeclared (first use in this function)

This is not causing a compilation error in the mainline kernel, because
'msr' is being used as an argument of MSR_TM_ACTIVE(), which is defined as
the following when CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is *not* set:

	#define MSR_TM_ACTIVE(x) 0

This patch just fixes this issue avoiding the 'msr' variable usage outside
the CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM block, avoiding trusting in the
MSR_TM_ACTIVE() definition.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@...chmal.in-ulm.de>
Fixes: e1c3743e1a20 ("powerpc/tm: Set MSR[TS] just prior to recheckpoint")
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
@@ -755,11 +755,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn)
 		if (restore_tm_sigcontexts(current, &uc->uc_mcontext,
 					   &uc_transact->uc_mcontext))
 			goto badframe;
-	}
+	} else
 #endif
-	/* Fall through, for non-TM restore */
-	if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr)) {
+	{
 		/*
+		 * Fall through, for non-TM restore
+		 *
 		 * Unset MSR[TS] on the thread regs since MSR from user
 		 * context does not have MSR active, and recheckpoint was
 		 * not called since restore_tm_sigcontexts() was not called