[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190121122506.870485377@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:43:39 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot
<syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef1936e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 105/111] loop: Move loop_reread_partitions() out of loop_ctl_mutex
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
commit 85b0a54a82e4fbceeb1aebb7cb6909edd1a24668 upstream.
Calling loop_reread_partitions() under loop_ctl_mutex causes lockdep to
complain about circular lock dependency between bdev->bd_mutex and
lo->lo_ctl_mutex. The problem is that on loop device open or close
lo_open() and lo_release() get called with bdev->bd_mutex held and they
need to acquire loop_ctl_mutex. OTOH when loop_reread_partitions() is
called with loop_ctl_mutex held, it will call blkdev_reread_part() which
acquires bdev->bd_mutex. See syzbot report for details [1].
Move all calls of loop_rescan_partitions() out of loop_ctl_mutex to
avoid lockdep warning and fix deadlock possibility.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d1588
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef1936e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -679,6 +679,7 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_de
{
struct file *file, *old_file;
int error;
+ bool partscan;
error = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
if (error)
@@ -720,9 +721,10 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_de
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
fput(old_file);
- if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
- loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
+ partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+ if (partscan)
+ loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
return 0;
out_putf:
@@ -903,6 +905,7 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_devic
int lo_flags = 0;
int error;
loff_t size;
+ bool partscan;
/* This is safe, since we have a reference from open(). */
__module_get(THIS_MODULE);
@@ -969,14 +972,15 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_devic
lo->lo_state = Lo_bound;
if (part_shift)
lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
- if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
- loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
+ partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
/* Grab the block_device to prevent its destruction after we
* put /dev/loopXX inode. Later in __loop_clr_fd() we bdput(bdev).
*/
bdgrab(bdev);
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+ if (partscan)
+ loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
return 0;
out_unlock:
@@ -1157,6 +1161,8 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo,
int err;
struct loop_func_table *xfer;
kuid_t uid = current_uid();
+ struct block_device *bdev;
+ bool partscan = false;
err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
if (err)
@@ -1245,10 +1251,13 @@ out_unfreeze:
!(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)) {
lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
lo->lo_disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
- loop_reread_partitions(lo, lo->lo_device);
+ bdev = lo->lo_device;
+ partscan = true;
}
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+ if (partscan)
+ loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
return err;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists