linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.20 106/111] loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190121122506.921031269@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:43:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot 
        <syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef1936e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 106/111] loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 0da03cab87e6323ff2e05b14bc7d5c6fcc531efd upstream.

Calling blkdev_reread_part() under loop_ctl_mutex causes lockdep to
complain about circular lock dependency between bdev->bd_mutex and
lo->lo_ctl_mutex. The problem is that on loop device open or close
lo_open() and lo_release() get called with bdev->bd_mutex held and they
need to acquire loop_ctl_mutex. OTOH when loop_reread_partitions() is
called with loop_ctl_mutex held, it will call blkdev_reread_part() which
acquires bdev->bd_mutex. See syzbot report for details [1].

Move call to blkdev_reread_part() in __loop_clr_fd() from under
loop_ctl_mutex to finish fixing of the lockdep warning and the possible
deadlock.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d1588

Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef1936e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/loop.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1030,12 +1030,14 @@ loop_init_xfer(struct loop_device *lo, s
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
+static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
 {
 	struct file *filp = NULL;
 	gfp_t gfp = lo->old_gfp_mask;
 	struct block_device *bdev = lo->lo_device;
 	int err = 0;
+	bool partscan = false;
+	int lo_number;
 
 	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lo->lo_state != Lo_rundown)) {
@@ -1088,7 +1090,15 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_dev
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
 	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
 
-	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev) {
+	partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev;
+	lo_number = lo->lo_number;
+	lo->lo_flags = 0;
+	if (!part_shift)
+		lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
+	loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+	if (partscan) {
 		/*
 		 * bd_mutex has been held already in release path, so don't
 		 * acquire it if this function is called in such case.
@@ -1097,21 +1107,15 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_dev
 		 * must be at least one and it can only become zero when the
 		 * current holder is released.
 		 */
-		if (!atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt))
+		if (release)
 			err = __blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
 		else
 			err = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
 		pr_warn("%s: partition scan of loop%d failed (rc=%d)\n",
-			__func__, lo->lo_number, err);
+			__func__, lo_number, err);
 		/* Device is gone, no point in returning error */
 		err = 0;
 	}
-	lo->lo_flags = 0;
-	if (!part_shift)
-		lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
-	loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
-out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	/*
 	 * Need not hold loop_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
 	 * Calling fput holding loop_ctl_mutex triggers a circular
@@ -1152,7 +1156,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_devic
 	lo->lo_state = Lo_rundown;
 	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 
-	return __loop_clr_fd(lo);
+	return __loop_clr_fd(lo, false);
 }
 
 static int
@@ -1713,7 +1717,7 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d
 		 * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread
 		 * and remove configuration after last close.
 		 */
-		__loop_clr_fd(lo);
+		__loop_clr_fd(lo, true);
 		return;
 	} else if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound) {
 		/*