linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 48/51] loop: Get rid of loop_index

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190121122458.478713698@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:44:44 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 48/51] loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 0a42e99b58a208839626465af194cfe640ef9493 upstream.

Now that loop_ctl_mutex is global, just get rid of loop_index_mutex as
there is no good reason to keep these two separate and it just
complicates the locking.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/loop.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
 static DEFINE_IDR(loop_index_idr);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_index_mutex);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_ctl_mutex);
 
 static int max_part;
@@ -1560,9 +1559,11 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_
 static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
 {
 	struct loop_device *lo;
-	int err = 0;
+	int err;
 
-	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 	lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
 	if (!lo) {
 		err = -ENXIO;
@@ -1571,7 +1572,7 @@ static int lo_open(struct block_device *
 
 	atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt);
 out:
-	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -1580,12 +1581,11 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d
 	struct loop_device *lo;
 	int err;
 
-	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	lo = disk->private_data;
 	if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
-		goto unlock_index;
+		goto out_unlock;
 
-	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
 		/*
 		 * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread
@@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d
 		 */
 		err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
 		if (!err)
-			goto unlock_index;
+			return;
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config,
@@ -1602,9 +1602,8 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d
 		loop_flush(lo);
 	}
 
+out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
-unlock_index:
-	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
 }
 
 static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = {
@@ -1890,7 +1889,7 @@ static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t
 	struct kobject *kobj;
 	int err;
 
-	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	err = loop_lookup(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift);
 	if (err < 0)
 		err = loop_add(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift);
@@ -1898,7 +1897,7 @@ static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t
 		kobj = NULL;
 	else
 		kobj = get_disk(lo->lo_disk);
-	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 
 	*part = 0;
 	return kobj;
@@ -1908,9 +1907,13 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi
 			       unsigned long parm)
 {
 	struct loop_device *lo;
-	int ret = -ENOSYS;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
-	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	ret = -ENOSYS;
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case LOOP_CTL_ADD:
 		ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm);
@@ -1924,7 +1927,6 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi
 		ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
-		mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 		if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
 			mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
@@ -1936,7 +1938,6 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi
 			break;
 		}
 		lo->lo_disk->private_data = NULL;
-		mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 		idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number);
 		loop_remove(lo);
 		break;
@@ -1946,7 +1947,7 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi
 			break;
 		ret = loop_add(&lo, -1);
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -2029,10 +2030,10 @@ static int __init loop_init(void)
 				  THIS_MODULE, loop_probe, NULL, NULL);
 
 	/* pre-create number of devices given by config or max_loop */
-	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
 		loop_add(&lo, i);
-	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "loop: module loaded\n");
 	return 0;