linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 91/99] loop: Move special partition reread handling in loop_clr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190121134918.132836499@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:49:23 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 91/99] loop: Move special partition reread handling in loop_clr_fd()

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit d57f3374ba4817f7c8d26fae8a13d20ac8d31b92 upstream.

The call of __blkdev_reread_part() from loop_reread_partition() happens
only when we need to invalidate partitions from loop_release(). Thus
move a detection for this into loop_clr_fd() and simplify
loop_reread_partition().

This makes loop_reread_partition() safe to use without loop_ctl_mutex
because we use only lo->lo_number and lo->lo_file_name in case of error
for reporting purposes (thus possibly reporting outdate information is
not a big deal) and we are safe from 'lo' going away under us by
elevated lo->lo_refcnt.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/loop.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -631,18 +631,7 @@ static void loop_reread_partitions(struc
 {
 	int rc;
 
-	/*
-	 * bd_mutex has been held already in release path, so don't
-	 * acquire it if this function is called in such case.
-	 *
-	 * If the reread partition isn't from release path, lo_refcnt
-	 * must be at least one and it can only become zero when the
-	 * current holder is released.
-	 */
-	if (!atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt))
-		rc = __blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
-	else
-		rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
+	rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
 	if (rc)
 		pr_warn("%s: partition scan of loop%d (%s) failed (rc=%d)\n",
 			__func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name, rc);
@@ -1096,8 +1085,24 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_dev
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
 	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
 
-	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev)
-		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
+	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev) {
+		/*
+		 * bd_mutex has been held already in release path, so don't
+		 * acquire it if this function is called in such case.
+		 *
+		 * If the reread partition isn't from release path, lo_refcnt
+		 * must be at least one and it can only become zero when the
+		 * current holder is released.
+		 */
+		if (!atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt))
+			err = __blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
+		else
+			err = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
+		pr_warn("%s: partition scan of loop%d failed (rc=%d)\n",
+			__func__, lo->lo_number, err);
+		/* Device is gone, no point in returning error */
+		err = 0;
+	}
 	lo->lo_flags = 0;
 	if (!part_shift)
 		lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;