[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190122213936.GH261387@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:39:36 -0800
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
hemantg@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Deassert RTS while baudrate
change command
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 09:56:13AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 04:31:09PM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:44:16AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 09:21:09AM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > >
> > > > I observed that the qcom_geni_serial driver doesn't raise RTS with
> > > > flow control disabled. It seems we have to investigate why that's the
> > > > case. I agree that the driver should be platform agnostic.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a driver bug, unless the hardware is just "odd". The
> > > driver implementation of this looks very non-standard judging from a
> > > quick peek.
> > >
> > > In fact, qcom_geni_serial_get_mctrl() is currently a no-op if hardware
> > > flow control is not enabled:
> > >
> > > if (uart_console(uport) || !uart_cts_enabled(uport))
> > > return;
> > >
> > > Perhaps dropping the !uart_cts_enabled() test is sufficient.
> >
> > Thanks for taking a look Johan, that was indeed the problem (also
> > in set_mctrl()). I posted a fix: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1033611/
>
> Nice (I did mean set_mctrl() above, as I think you noticed).
>
> > Balakrishna, the following (applied on top of your patch) works for me
> > with the UART patch above:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> > index 9d5e41f159c78f..60bfdf01f72841 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> > @@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ static int qca_set_speed(struct hci_uart *hu, enum qca_speed_type speed_type)
> > {
> > unsigned int speed, qca_baudrate;
> > struct qca_serdev *qcadev;
> > - int ret;
> > + int ret = 0;
> >
> > if (speed_type == QCA_INIT_SPEED) {
> > speed = qca_get_speed(hu, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
> > @@ -1097,22 +1097,27 @@ static int qca_set_speed(struct hci_uart *hu, enum qca_speed_type speed_type)
> > * the old speed.
> > */
> > qcadev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(hu->serdev);
> > - if (qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_WCN3990)
> > + if (qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_WCN3990) {
> > + hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, true);
>
> Wow, yeah, this parameter inversion is indeed confusing...
>
> > serdev_device_set_rts(hu->serdev, false);
> > + }
>
> But looking at hci_uart_set_flow_control() now, it actually also
> deasserts RTS. So all you need here is the hci_uart_set_flow_control()
> call.
Great, thanks for pointing that out!
> And that makes the inversion make a bit more sense too, even if the
> naming is a bit unfortunate with respect to
> serdev_device_set_flow_control() at least.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists