[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXN2+bBiOT6svRE+1VtY7BQTFjjD_s4pzO8J7-dDx9QLDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:34:51 -0800
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Ben Chan <benchan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Define rmtfs memory
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:26 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> 2. In https://crrev.com/c/1119572, the argument was made that the size
> of this carveout is board-specific. That makes it hard to put it in
> sdm845.dts.
And we've increased the size of the memory carve-out since then,
because the memory requirements depend on the SW features you're using
on the modem side.
So that's definitely a reason for giving it a label we can modify it
with, at a minimum (as Doug suggested). I'm somewhat ambivalent as to
whether this should or shouldn't go in the base sdm845.dtsi -- it's
still a feature where most of the definitions (e.g., compatible;
client ID) should be applicable to all boards.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists