lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190123023902.4bbf5c5c@dimatab>
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 02:39:02 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
Cc:     "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mantravadi Karthik <mkarthik@...dia.com>,
        "Shardar Mohammed" <smohammed@...dia.com>,
        Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] i2c: tegra: Add Bus Clear Master Support

В Tue, 22 Jan 2019 23:26:08 +0000
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com> пишет:

> >> >> +	if (i2c_dev->msg_err == I2C_ERR_ARBITRATION_LOST) {
> >> >> +		if (!i2c_dev->is_multimaster_mode)
> >> >> +			return
> >> >> tegra_i2c_issue_bus_clear(i2c_dev);
> >> >> +		return -EAGAIN;  
> >> >
> >> >This changes the returned errno from -EIO to -EAGAIN for the 
> >> >supports_bus_clear=false case, is it okay and intentional?
> >> >    
> >> 
> >> Yes EAGAIN is intentional to allow for transfer retry.
> >> During single master mode, ARBITRATION LOST notification happens
> >> when 1. I2C Master sees the bus is occupied by some other device
> >> when a transfer is initiated 2. I2C Master lost the bus during
> >> arbitration incase if slave device pulls SDA line low continuously
> >> for some unknown reason If arbitration lost is due to cause 1,
> >> retry helps to continue with transfer once bus is released by the
> >> slave and it just added delay in communication due to bus release
> >> delay by slave. In case of 2nd cause, retry never succeeds in
> >> cases where bus clear is not supported.  
> >
> >It's unclear whether the "never succeeds retry" may fail with the
> >EAGAIN, causing an endless retry-loop. Could you please clarify this
> >moment?  
> 
> during master transmit mode, on arbitration lost and if master
> doesn’t support bus clear to recover then transfer will return
> EAGAIN. I2c core base driver performs retries if return code from
> i2c_transfer is EAGAIN up to specified retries in i2c adapter and
> returns the ret code from the last retry. Retry is not endless as i2c
> core base performs retry only up to specified adapter retries.
> Following return code from documentation
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/i2c/fault-codes
> 
> 

Good, thanks for the clarification.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ