[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190122235134.GE14636@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:51:34 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Don't clear pme_poll on device that has
unreliable ACPI wake
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:45:44PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> There are some e1000e devices can only be woken up from D3 one time, by
> plugging ethernet cable. Subsequent cable plugging does set PME bit
> correctly, but it still doesn't get woken up.
>
> Since e1000e connects to the root complex directly, we rely on ACPI to
> wake it up. In this case, the GPE from _PRW only works once and stops
> working after that.
>
> So introduce a new PCI quirk, to avoid clearing pme_poll flag for buggy
> platform firmwares that have unreliable GPE wake.
This quirk applies to all 0x15bb (E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_CNP_I219_LM7) and
0x15bd (E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_CNP_I219_LM6) devices. The e1000e driver
claims about a zillion different device IDs.
I would be surprised if these two devices are defective but all the
others work correctly. Could it be that there is a problem with the
wiring on this particular motherboard or with the ACPI _PRW methods
(or the way Linux interprets them) in this firmware?
Would you mind attaching a complete dmesg log and "sudo lspci -vvv"
output to the bugzilla, please?
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index e1949f7efd9c..184e2fc8a294 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static void pci_acpi_wake_dev(struct acpi_device_wakeup_context *context)
>
> pci_dev = to_pci_dev(context->dev);
>
> - if (pci_dev->pme_poll)
> + if (pci_dev->pme_poll && !pci_dev->unreliable_acpi_wake)
> pci_dev->pme_poll = false;
>
> if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D3cold) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index b0a413f3f7ca..ed4863496fa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -4948,6 +4948,14 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_ANY_ID,
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_CLASS_MULTIMEDIA_HD_AUDIO, 8, quirk_gpu_hda);
>
> +static void quirk_unreliable_acpi_wake(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + pci_info(pdev, "ACPI Wake unreliable, always poll PME\n");
> + pdev->unreliable_acpi_wake = 1;
> +}
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x15bb, quirk_unreliable_acpi_wake);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x15bd, quirk_unreliable_acpi_wake);
> +
> /*
> * Some IDT switches incorrectly flag an ACS Source Validation error on
> * completions for config read requests even though PCIe r4.0, sec
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 65f1d8c2f082..d22065c1576f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
> unsigned int pme_support:5; /* Bitmask of states from which PME#
> can be generated */
> unsigned int pme_poll:1; /* Poll device's PME status bit */
> + unsigned int unreliable_acpi_wake:1; /* ACPI Wake doesn't always work */
> unsigned int d1_support:1; /* Low power state D1 is supported */
> unsigned int d2_support:1; /* Low power state D2 is supported */
> unsigned int no_d1d2:1; /* D1 and D2 are forbidden */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists