[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190122102344.GA31836@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:23:44 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: process: GPL -> GPL-compatible
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:34:08AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Drivers under MIT, BSD-17-clause, or uncle-Bob's-newest-take-on-PD are
> all fine, not just GPL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
> ---
> Not reformatting to fill lines, it'll semi-conflict with another patch
> that's been acked but not yet pushed.
>
> Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst
> index 24f5aeecee91..9b69fb08b65e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst
> @@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ nightmare, and trying to keep up with an ever changing kernel interface
> is also a rough job.
>
> Simple, get your kernel driver into the main kernel tree (remember we
> -are talking about GPL released drivers here, if your code doesn't fall
> +are talking about drivers released under a GPL-compatible license here,
> +if your code doesn't fall
> under this category, good luck, you are on your own here, you leech
> <insert link to leech comment from Andrew and Linus here>.) If your
> driver is in the tree, and a kernel interface changes, it will be fixed
Nice fix:
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists