[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-1a51c5da5acc6c188c917ba572eebac5f8793432@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 03:35:16 -0800
From: tip-bot for Stephane Eranian <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eranian@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, acme@...hat.com
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf core: Fix perf_proc_update_handler() bug
Commit-ID: 1a51c5da5acc6c188c917ba572eebac5f8793432
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/1a51c5da5acc6c188c917ba572eebac5f8793432
Author: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:17:16 -0800
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:10:38 -0300
perf core: Fix perf_proc_update_handler() bug
The perf_proc_update_handler() handles /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate
syctl variable. When the PMU IRQ handler timing monitoring is disabled, i.e,
when /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent is equal to 0 or 100,
then no modification to sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate is allowed to prevent
possible hang from wrong values.
The problem is that the test to prevent modification is made after the
sysctl variable is modified in perf_proc_update_handler().
You get an error:
$ echo 10001 >/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate
echo: write error: invalid argument
But the value is still modified causing all sorts of inconsistencies:
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate
10001
This patch fixes the problem by moving the parsing of the value after
the test.
Committer testing:
# echo 100 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent
# echo 10001 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
# cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate
10001
#
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547169436-6266-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 3cd13a30f732..e5ede6918050 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -436,18 +436,18 @@ int perf_proc_update_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
loff_t *ppos)
{
- int ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
-
- if (ret || !write)
- return ret;
-
+ int ret;
+ int perf_cpu = sysctl_perf_cpu_time_max_percent;
/*
* If throttling is disabled don't allow the write:
*/
- if (sysctl_perf_cpu_time_max_percent == 100 ||
- sysctl_perf_cpu_time_max_percent == 0)
+ if (write && (perf_cpu == 100 || perf_cpu == 0))
return -EINVAL;
+ ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ if (ret || !write)
+ return ret;
+
max_samples_per_tick = DIV_ROUND_UP(sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate, HZ);
perf_sample_period_ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate;
update_perf_cpu_limits();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists