linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: update config dependencies for QCOM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:00:44 +0530
From:   Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
        david.brown@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: update config dependencies for QCOM_RPMPD



On 1/18/2019 11:09 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2019-01-17 20:48:01)
>>   drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>> index a5d5167c3f16..1ee298f6bf17 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ config QCOM_RPMHPD
>>   
>>   config QCOM_RPMPD
>>          bool "Qualcomm RPM Power domain driver"
> 
> Just curious, does it need to be bool for some reason?

Here's the link to the discussion around it on the v3 patchset of this series
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/12/111

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation