linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add devicetree binding for Oxalis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190122030011.GC19233@dragon>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:00:12 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "a.tropschug@...-systart.com" <a.tropschug@...-systart.com>,
        "m.bittner@...-systart.com" <m.bittner@...-systart.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add devicetree binding for
 Oxalis

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 07:57:20PM +0000, Leo Li wrote:
> > > So it seems the compatible of the boards below are missing there.
> > >
> > >   ls1021a-moxa-uc-8410a.dts
> > >   ls1021a-qds.dts
> > >   ls1021a-twr.dts
> > 
> > So how should we proceed here? The above mentioned boards are lacking
> > compatible in dts files and I guess that's the reason they didn't get
> > mentioned in "fsl" binding file.
> > 
> > Should I just go ahead and add the compatibles for these boards and list
> > them in binding file?
> 
> Please go ahead and do that.  One thing is that the moxa-uc-8410a board is a 3rd-party board, not sure if it should belong to the fsl binding file.

The fsl.yaml is designed to contain various boards using fsl SoCs, so
it's fine.

Shawn