linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/livepatch: return -ERRNO values in save_stack_trace_tsk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190122155724.27557-5-joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:57:24 -0500
From:   Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>, Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/livepatch: return -ERRNO values in save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable()

To match its x86 counterpart, save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() should
return -EINVAL in cases that it is currently returning 1.  No caller is
currently differentiating non-zero error codes, but let's keep the
arch-specific implementations consistent.

Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 28c3c25755d7..cf31ce6c1f53 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(struct task_struct *tsk,
 
 	if (sp < stack_page + sizeof(struct thread_struct) ||
 	    sp > stack_end - STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE) {
-		return 1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	for (firstframe = true; sp != stack_end;
@@ -143,16 +143,16 @@ save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(struct task_struct *tsk,
 
 		/* sanity check: ABI requires SP to be aligned 16 bytes. */
 		if (sp & 0xF)
-			return 1;
+			return -EINVAL;
 
 		newsp = stack[0];
 		/* Stack grows downwards; unwinder may only go up. */
 		if (newsp <= sp)
-			return 1;
+			return -EINVAL;
 
 		if (newsp != stack_end &&
 		    newsp > stack_end - STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE) {
-			return 1; /* invalid backlink, too far up. */
+			return -EINVAL; /* invalid backlink, too far up. */
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -166,13 +166,13 @@ save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		/* Mark stacktraces with exception frames as unreliable. */
 		if (sp <= stack_end - STACK_INT_FRAME_SIZE &&
 		    stack[STACK_FRAME_MARKER] == STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER) {
-			return 1;
+			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
 		/* Examine the saved LR: it must point into kernel code. */
 		ip = stack[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
 		if (!__kernel_text_address(ip))
-			return 1;
+			return -EINVAL;
 
 		/*
 		 * FIXME: IMHO these tests do not belong in
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		 * as unreliable.
 		 */
 		if (ip == (unsigned long)kretprobe_trampoline)
-			return 1;
+			return -EINVAL;
 #endif
 
 		if (trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries)
-- 
2.20.1