[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iEanKEhLkonZwqBYV1e-=-yKbStj0SoL0x6UNQxaOft=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:36:36 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <joro@...tes.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
pdaly@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pratikp@...eaurora.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Move to bitmap for arm_smmu_domain atrributes
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 7:23 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>
> On 21/01/2019 05:53, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > A number of arm_smmu_domain's attributes can be assigned based
> > on the iommu domains's attributes. These local attributes better
> > be managed by a bitmap.
> > So remove boolean flags and move to a 32-bit bitmap, and enable
> > each bits separtely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > index 7ebbcf1b2eb3..52b300dfc096 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > @@ -257,10 +257,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
> > const struct iommu_gather_ops *tlb_ops;
> > struct arm_smmu_cfg cfg;
> > enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage;
> > - bool non_strict;
> > struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */
> > spinlock_t cb_lock; /* Serialises ATS1* ops and TLB syncs */
> > struct iommu_domain domain;
> > +#define ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_ATTR_NON_STRICT BIT(0)
> > + unsigned int attr;
> > };
> >
> > struct arm_smmu_option_prop {
> > @@ -901,7 +902,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK)
> > pgtbl_cfg.quirks = IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_DMA;
> >
> > - if (smmu_domain->non_strict)
> > + if (smmu_domain->attr & ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_ATTR_NON_STRICT)
> > pgtbl_cfg.quirks |= IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT;
> >
> > /* Non coherent page table mappings only for Stage-1 */
> > @@ -1598,7 +1599,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA:
> > switch (attr) {
> > case DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE:
> > - *(int *)data = smmu_domain->non_strict;
> > + *(int *)data = !!(smmu_domain->attr &
> > + ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_ATTR_NON_STRICT);
> > return 0;
> > default:
> > return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -1638,7 +1640,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_set_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA:
> > switch (attr) {
> > case DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE:
> > - smmu_domain->non_strict = *(int *)data;
> > + smmu_domain->attr |= ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_ATTR_NON_STRICT;
>
> But what if *data == 0?
Right, a check for data here also similar to what we are doing for
QCOM_SYS_CACHE [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1033796/
Regards
Vivek
>
> Robin.
>
> > break;
> > default:
> > ret = -ENODEV;
> >
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists