[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190122172246.GD7579@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:22:46 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: no need to check return value of debugfs_create
functions
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:43:52PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:38:26PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > No, it also fails if there's already something with the same name in
> > debugfs which can happen as as a result of configuration. This gets
> > confusing for users, they see the debugfs files they're expecting but
> > the contents don't match up at all.
> How can you allow a duplicate name for the other regmap stuff? Will
> that not also cause a collision somewhere else?
No, the only place we actually use the names for anything is when
creating the debugfs. Otherwise the driver using the regmap deals with
a pointer to the regmap which doesn't have any collision risk.
> Anyway, if this is that big of a problem, ok, but then your code will
> run differently if debugfs is enabled or not, which isn't ok. Don't
> rely on debugfs to do your name filtering for you :)
I'd rather hope that the debugfs creation code runs differently
depending on if debugfs is enabled, perhaps that's just a strange foible
of mine. :)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists