lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:59:56 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: domain: no need to check return value of
 debugfs_create functions

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 08:44:36AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 16:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
> 
> Doesn't this boils done to whether we want to care to check if memory
> allocation failed?

You should not care.

> Somewhere down the call chain from debugfs_create_dir(), we end up in
> alloc_inode() and it looks like that can fail, no?

Yes it can, right now it will return NULL, I'll go change that to return
ENOMEM, but even then, your really do not care what happens as none of
your other code flow should ever care about what debugfs does, or does
not, do.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ