linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] crypto: s5p: add AES support for Exynos5433

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 09:13:28 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com>
Cc:     Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] crypto: s5p: add AES support for Exynos5433

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 16:26, Kamil Konieczny
<k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Add AES crypto HW acceleration for Exynos5433, with the help of SlimSSS IP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> index 0064be0e3941..1ae570ad4391 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@
>   * struct samsung_aes_variant - platform specific SSS driver data
>   * @aes_offset: AES register offset from SSS module's base.
>   * @hash_offset: HASH register offset from SSS module's base.
> + * @clk_names: names of clocks needed to run SSS IP
>   *
>   * Specifies platform specific configuration of SSS module.
>   * Note: A structure for driver specific platform data is used for future
> @@ -240,6 +241,7 @@
>  struct samsung_aes_variant {
>         unsigned int                    aes_offset;
>         unsigned int                    hash_offset;
> +       char                            *clk_names[];
>  };
>
>  struct s5p_aes_reqctx {
> @@ -296,6 +298,7 @@ struct s5p_aes_ctx {
>  struct s5p_aes_dev {
>         struct device                   *dev;
>         struct clk                      *clk;
> +       struct clk                      *pclk;
>         void __iomem                    *ioaddr;
>         void __iomem                    *aes_ioaddr;
>         int                             irq_fc;
> @@ -384,11 +387,19 @@ struct s5p_hash_ctx {
>  static const struct samsung_aes_variant s5p_aes_data = {
>         .aes_offset     = 0x4000,
>         .hash_offset    = 0x6000,
> +       .clk_names      = { "secss", }

Put trailing comma so it can be extended without touching previous
line (just like old code).

>  };
>
>  static const struct samsung_aes_variant exynos_aes_data = {
>         .aes_offset     = 0x200,
>         .hash_offset    = 0x400,
> +       .clk_names      = { "secss", }

Ditto.

> +};
> +
> +static const struct samsung_aes_variant exynos5433_slim_aes_data = {
> +       .aes_offset     = 0x400,
> +       .hash_offset    = 0x800,
> +       .clk_names      = { "pclk", "aclk", }

Ditto.

>  };
>
>  static const struct of_device_id s5p_sss_dt_match[] = {
> @@ -400,6 +411,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id s5p_sss_dt_match[] = {
>                 .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-secss",
>                 .data = &exynos_aes_data,
>         },
> +       {
> +               .compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-slim-sss",
> +               .data = &exynos5433_slim_aes_data,
> +       },
>         { },
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, s5p_sss_dt_match);
> @@ -2208,18 +2223,40 @@ static int s5p_aes_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                         return PTR_ERR(pdata->ioaddr);
>         }
>
> -       pdata->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "secss");
> +       pdata->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, variant->clk_names[0]);
>         if (IS_ERR(pdata->clk)) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "failed to find secss clock source\n");
> +               dev_err(dev, "failed to find secss clock %s\n",
> +                       variant->clk_names[0]);
>                 return -ENOENT;
>         }
>
>         err = clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk);
>         if (err < 0) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "Enabling SSS clk failed, err %d\n", err);
> +               dev_err(dev, "Enabling clock %s failed, err %d\n",
> +                       variant->clk_names[0], err);
>                 return err;
>         }
>
> +       if (variant->clk_names[1]) {
> +               pdata->pclk = devm_clk_get(dev, variant->clk_names[1]);
> +               if (IS_ERR(pdata->pclk)) {
> +                       dev_err(dev, "failed to find clock %s\n",
> +                               variant->clk_names[1]);
> +                       clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->clk);
> +                       return -ENOENT;

goto err_irq (eventually rename the label)?

> +                       }

Indentation looks wrong here.

> +
> +               err = clk_prepare_enable(pdata->pclk);
> +               if (err < 0) {
> +                       dev_err(dev, "Enabling clock %s failed, err %d\n",
> +                               variant->clk_names[0], err);
> +                       clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->clk);
> +                       return err;

goto...

Best regards,
Krzysztof