[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901231330460.1628@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:33:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Liebler <stli@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_owner) within wake_futex_pi() triggered
Heiko,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> It doesn't look like it does. One occurrence was the one below when
> using commit 7939f8beecf1 (which is post 5.0-rc2) for building the
> kernel:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 23505 at kernel/futex.c:1483 do_futex+0xa9a/0xc50
> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
> CPU: 14 PID: 23505 Comm: ld.so.1 Not tainted 5.0.0-20190116.rc2.git0.7939f8beecf1.300.fc29.s390x+git #1
> Hardware name: IBM 3906 M04 704 (LPAR)
> Call Trace:
> ([<0000000000112e60>] show_stack+0x58/0x70)
> [<0000000000a671fa>] dump_stack+0x7a/0xa8
> [<0000000000143f52>] panic+0x11a/0x2d0
> [<0000000000143db0>] __warn+0xf8/0x118
> [<0000000000a662f8>] report_bug+0xd8/0x150
> [<00000000001014ac>] do_report_trap+0xc4/0xe0
> [<0000000000101680>] illegal_op+0x138/0x150
> [<0000000000a87270>] pgm_check_handler+0x1c8/0x220
> [<00000000001e9aea>] do_futex+0xa9a/0xc50
> ([<00000000001e9c4e>] do_futex+0xbfe/0xc50)
> [<00000000001ea13c>] compat_sys_futex+0xe4/0x170
> [<0000000000a86e84>] system_call+0xd8/0x2c8
Ok. That's another one which I can't spot yet.
Is that only on S390?
What's the test which explodes? Kernel build?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists