[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43155ea7637e45d6aad04f5747cbb6bb@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:23:24 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Florian Fainelli' <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"paul.gortmaker@...driver.com" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH reset-next 2/2] reset: brcmstb: Fix 32-bit build with
64-bit resource_size_t
From: Florian Fainelli
> Sent: 23 January 2019 00:34
>
> On 32-bit architectures defining resource_size_t as 64-bit (because of
> PAE), we can run into a linker failure because of the modulo and the
> division against resource_size(), replace the two problematic operations
> with an alignment check on the register resource (instead of modulo),
> and the division with DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL().
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Fixes: c196cdc7659d ("reset: Add Broadcom STB SW_INIT reset controller driver")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/reset/reset-brcmstb.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-brcmstb.c b/drivers/reset/reset-brcmstb.c
> index 01ab1f71518b..c4cab8b5052d 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-brcmstb.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ static int brcmstb_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> - if (resource_size(res) % SW_INIT_BANK_SIZE) {
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(res->start, SW_INIT_BANK_SIZE) ||
> + !IS_AGLINED(resource_size(res), SW_INIT_BANK_SIZE)) {
> dev_err(kdev, "incorrect register range\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -103,7 +104,8 @@ static int brcmstb_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_set_drvdata(kdev, priv);
>
> priv->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> - priv->rcdev.nr_resets = (resource_size(res) / SW_INIT_BANK_SIZE) * 32;
> + priv->rcdev.nr_resets = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(resource_size(res),
> + SW_INIT_BANK_SIZE) * 32;
> priv->rcdev.ops = &brcmstb_reset_ops;
> priv->rcdev.of_node = kdev->of_node;
> /* Use defaults: 1 cell and simple xlate function */
Isn't it enough to assign resource_size(res) to an 'unsigned int' ?
The value is never actually going to be over 4G.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists