[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190123143327.whlyx2223xzchbkl@e110439-lin>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:33:27 +0000
From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add utilization clamping
for RT tasks
On 23-Jan 11:28, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:15:06AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > - util = (type == ENERGY_UTIL)
> > - ? util_cfs
> > - : uclamp_util(rq, util_cfs);
> > - util += cpu_util_rt(rq);
> > + util = cpu_util_rt(rq);
> > + if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL) {
> > + util += cpu_util_cfs(rq);
> > + util = uclamp_util(rq, util);
> > + } else {
> > + util += util_cfs;
> > + }
>
> Or the combined thing:
>
> - util = util_cfs;
> - util += cpu_util_rt(rq);
> + util = cpu_util_rt(rq);
> + if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL) {
> + util += cpu_util_cfs(rq);
> + util = uclamp_util(rq, util);
> + } else {
> + util += util_cfs;
> + }
>
>
> Leaves me confused.
>
> When type == FREQ, util_cfs should already be cpu_util_cfs(), per
> sugov_get_util().
>
> So should that not end up like:
>
> util = util_cfs;
> util += cpu_util_rt(rq);
> + if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL)
> + util = uclamp_util(rq, util);
>
> instead?
You right, I get to that core after the patches which integrate
compute_energy(). The chuck above was the version before the EM got
merged but I missed to backport the change once I rebased on
tip/sched/core with the EM in.
Sorry for the confusion, will fix in v7.
Cheers
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists