[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190123155121.GB7503@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:51:21 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: mazziesaccount@...il.com, lee.jones@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
sre@...nel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com, heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 03/13] regulator: bd718x7 use chip specific and
generic data structs
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:43:28AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Header rohm-bd718x7.h was split to generic and component specific
> parts. This changed the struct bd718x7. Adapt the regulator driver to
> these changes.
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Does this need to be squashed into the earlier commit for bisection?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists