[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190123155850.GB8721@amd>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:58:50 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Hutter, Tony" <hutter2@...l.gov>,
Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Kash Pande <kash@...pleback.net>
Subject: Re: x86/fpu: Don't export __kernel_fpu_{begin,end}()
On Fri 2019-01-11 06:40:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 06:04:07AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:24:13PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > My tolerance for ZFS is pretty non-existant. Sun explicitly did not
> > > want their code to work on Linux, so why would we do extra work to get
> > > their code to work properly?
> >
> > ZoL facilitates seamless r/w cross-mounting with macOS, something no
> > other filesystem allows, and that feature is critical for me to work
> > on Linux drivers for Mac hardware. Please don't make life harder than
> > necessary for developers like me. Your "extra work" argument seems
> > disingenuous to me, Sebastian's patch is causing extra work for
> > ZFS developers, not the kernel community. The maintenance burden
> > for the kernel community to retain the export is zero.
>
> Sorry, no, we do not keep symbols exported for no in-kernel users.
Killing ZFS is _not_ nice. Its not like ZFS is closed source...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists