linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: intel_stratix10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:00:19 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     richard.gong@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     atull@...nel.org, dinguyen@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, todd.riffel@...el.com,
        Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: intel_stratix10_service: add hardware
 dependency

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:47:56AM -0600, richard.gong@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
> 
> Add a Kconfig dependency to ensure Intel Stratix10 service layer driver
> can be built only on the platform that supports it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> index f754578..cac16c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ config FW_CFG_SYSFS_CMDLINE
>  
>  config INTEL_STRATIX10_SERVICE
>  	tristate "Intel Stratix10 Service Layer"
> -	depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> +	depends on ARCH_STRATIX10 && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC

That's lame, what about building for testing?

And is this needed now, for 5.0-final, or can it wait for 5.1?  What
changed to require this?

tahnks,

greg k-h