linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: intel_stratix10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANk1AXS=jG5qG31rOwhNF=y1YowA97cvmsvBPr6JfRFEz8JEhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:01:53 -0600
From:   Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
To:     Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Richard Gong <richard.gong@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        todd.riffel@...el.com, Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: intel_stratix10_service: add hardware dependency

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:42 AM Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/23/19 10:37 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:00 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:47:56AM -0600, richard.gong@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> >>> From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
> >>>
> >>> Add a Kconfig dependency to ensure Intel Stratix10 service layer driver
> >>> can be built only on the platform that supports it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> >>> index f754578..cac16c4 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ config FW_CFG_SYSFS_CMDLINE
> >>>
> >>>  config INTEL_STRATIX10_SERVICE
> >>>       tristate "Intel Stratix10 Service Layer"
> >>> -     depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> >>> +     depends on ARCH_STRATIX10 && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> >>
> >> That's lame, what about building for testing?
> >
> > Do you mean this instead?
> >
> > depends on (ARCH_STRATIX10 && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC) || COMPILE_TEST
> >
> >>
> >> And is this needed now, for 5.0-final, or can it wait for 5.1?
> >
> > This change will reduce kernel size for most arm64.  It can go into
> > whichever kernel.  We can resubmit allowing for COMPILE_TEST.
> >
>
> I don't see how this is true? ARM64 has a single defconfig and
> ARCH_STRATIX10 is included in that defconfig. I don't see how adding
> this dependency will reduce the kernel size for most arm64?

Sorry, I wasn't clear.  By default it will be built in since there's
one arm64 defconfig.  But adding ARCH_STRATIX10 dependency here
supports users who turn off all the ARCH_* they don't care about in
their own defconfig that won't get upstreamed.

>
> Dinh