linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] iw_cxgb4: drop check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <91af1982-e309-476e-cfa4-2f6ef1ee598b@opengridcomputing.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:45:11 -0600
From:   Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iw_cxgb4: drop check - dead code



On 1/23/2019 12:30 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 02:27:13AM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>> The kmalloc is called with  | __GFP_NOFAIL  so there is no point in
>> checking the return value - it either returns valid storage or it would
>> hang/terminate there. But it is not possible to say if the use of
>> __GFP_NOFAIL is really needed and the check should be removed or
>> vice-versa (use of __GFP_NOFAIL should be only in exceptional
>> cases as I understand it and alloc_srq_queue() is called in quite
>> a few places)
>> In either way it would need fixing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
>> Fixes: 6a0b6174d35a ("rdma/cxgb4: Add support for kernel mode SRQ's")
>> ---
> 
> Steve? It seems weird to have NOFAIL and then have an error unwind
> path, what is the deal here?
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c
>> index 917ce5c..c2a12ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c
>> @@ -2597,8 +2597,6 @@ static int alloc_srq_queue(struct c4iw_srq *srq, struct c4iw_dev_ucontext *uctx,
>>  	wr_len = sizeof(*res_wr) + sizeof(*res);
>>  
>>  	skb = alloc_skb(wr_len, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>> -	if (!skb)
>> -		goto err_free_queue;
>>  	set_wr_txq(skb, CPL_PRIORITY_CONTROL, 0);
>>  
>>  	res_wr = (struct fw_ri_res_wr *)__skb_put(skb, wr_len);
>> -- 
>> 2.1.4
>>

The other queue allocations in qp.c don't use __GFP_NOFAIL.  So either
leave it and remove the error check as per this patch, or remove the
NOFAIL and leave the check.

I suggest you remove the __GFP_NOFAIL, since I have a recollection that
using it was frowned upon.  In this case, if there is no memory
available it is reasonable to return that error to the user creating the
srq...


Steve.