[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1901231416040.1564-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:17:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@....com>
cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie@....com>, Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>,
Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@...escale.com>,
Nikhil Badola <nikhil.badola@...escale.com>,
Suresh Gupta <suresh.gupta@...escale.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] usb :fsl: Change string format for errata property
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
> From: Nikhil Badola <nikhil.badola@...escale.com>
>
> Remove USB errata checking code from driver. Applicability of erratum
> is retrieved by reading corresponding property in device tree.
> This property is written during device tree fixup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@...escale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Badola <nikhil.badola@...escale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@....com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/fsl-mph-dr-of.c | 14 ++++----------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/fsl-mph-dr-of.c b/drivers/usb/host/fsl-mph-dr-of.c
> index bdc8812..ae8f60f 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/fsl-mph-dr-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/fsl-mph-dr-of.c
> @@ -224,16 +224,10 @@ static int fsl_usb2_mph_dr_of_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> of_property_read_bool(np, "fsl,usb-erratum-a005275");
> pdata->has_fsl_erratum_a005697 =
> of_property_read_bool(np, "fsl,usb_erratum-a005697");
> -
> - if (of_get_property(np, "fsl,usb_erratum_14", NULL))
> - pdata->has_fsl_erratum_14 = 1;
> - else
> - pdata->has_fsl_erratum_14 = 0;
> -
> - if (of_get_property(np, "fsl,erratum_a006918", NULL))
> - pdata->has_fsl_erratum_a006918 = 1;
> - else
> - pdata->has_fsl_erratum_a006918 = 0;
> + pdata->has_fsl_erratum_a006918 =
> + of_property_read_bool(np, "fsl,usb_erratum-a006918");
> + pdata->has_fsl_erratum_14 =
> + of_property_read_bool(np, "fsl,usb_erratum-14");
Why go to the trouble of adding bad code for has_fsl_erratum_a006918 in
patch 4/5 if you're going to change that code here? Why not just add
the correct code in the first place?
Alan Stern
>
> /*
> * Determine whether phy_clk_valid needs to be checked
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists