[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg+C65FJHB=Jx1OvuJP4kvpWdw+5G=XOXB6X_KB2XuofA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:27:21 +1300
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Josh Snyder <joshs@...flix.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: allow for making sys_mincore() privileged
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 9:23 AM Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> So I've done some basic smoke testing (~2 hours of LTP+xfstests) on the
> kernel with the three topmost patches from
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/jikos.git/log/?h=pagecache-sidechannel
>
> applied (also attaching to this mail), and no obvious breakage popped up.
>
> So if noone sees any principal problem there, I'll happily submit it with
> proper attribution etc.
So this seems to have died down, and a week later we seem to not have
a lot of noise here any more. I think it means people either weren't
testing it, or just didn't find any real problems.
I've reverted the 'let's try to just remove the code' part in my tree.
But I didn't apply the two other patches yet. Any final comments
before that should happen?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists