lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4i9_T9779ZyaYt2T3b20-wQTaWA4P63+49TM=a=twtDVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:54:40 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] mmu notifier provide context informations

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:23 PM <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
>
> Hi Andrew, i see that you still have my event patch in you queue [1].
> This patchset replace that single patch and is broken down in further
> step so that it is easier to review and ascertain that no mistake were
> made during mechanical changes. Here are the step:
>
>     Patch 1 - add the enum values
>     Patch 2 - coccinelle semantic patch to convert all call site of
>               mmu_notifier_range_init to default enum value and also
>               to passing down the vma when it is available
>     Patch 3 - update many call site to more accurate enum values
>     Patch 4 - add the information to the mmu_notifier_range struct
>     Patch 5 - helper to test if a range is updated to read only
>
> All the remaining patches are update to various driver to demonstrate
> how this new information get use by device driver. I build tested
> with make all and make all minus everything that enable mmu notifier
> ie building with MMU_NOTIFIER=no. Also tested with some radeon,amd
> gpu and intel gpu.
>
> If they are no objections i believe best plan would be to merge the
> the first 5 patches (all mm changes) through your queue for 5.1 and
> then to delay driver update to each individual driver tree for 5.2.
> This will allow each individual device driver maintainer time to more
> thouroughly test this more then my own testing.
>
> Note that i also intend to use this feature further in nouveau and
> HMM down the road. I also expect that other user like KVM might be
> interested into leveraging this new information to optimize some of
> there secondary page table invalidation.

"Down the road" users should introduce the functionality they want to
consume. The common concern with preemptively including
forward-looking infrastructure is realizing later that the
infrastructure is not needed, or needs changing. If it has no current
consumer, leave it out.

>
> Here is an explaination on the rational for this patchset:
>
>
> CPU page table update can happens for many reasons, not only as a result
> of a syscall (munmap(), mprotect(), mremap(), madvise(), ...) but also
> as a result of kernel activities (memory compression, reclaim, migration,
> ...).
>
> This patch introduce a set of enums that can be associated with each of
> the events triggering a mmu notifier. Latter patches take advantages of
> those enum values.
>
> - UNMAP: munmap() or mremap()
> - CLEAR: page table is cleared (migration, compaction, reclaim, ...)
> - PROTECTION_VMA: change in access protections for the range
> - PROTECTION_PAGE: change in access protections for page in the range
> - SOFT_DIRTY: soft dirtyness tracking
>
> Being able to identify munmap() and mremap() from other reasons why the
> page table is cleared is important to allow user of mmu notifier to
> update their own internal tracking structure accordingly (on munmap or
> mremap it is not longer needed to track range of virtual address as it
> becomes invalid).

The only context information consumed in this patch set is
MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA.

What is the practical benefit of these "optimize out the case when a
range is updated to read only" optimizations? Any numbers to show this
is worth the code thrash?

>
> [1] https://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-mmu_notifier-contextual-information-for-event-triggering-invalidation-v2.patch
>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Jérôme Glisse (9):
>   mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event enums
>   mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event triggering
>     invalidation
>   mm/mmu_notifier: use correct mmu_notifier events for each invalidation
>   mm/mmu_notifier: pass down vma and reasons why mmu notifier is
>     happening
>   mm/mmu_notifier: mmu_notifier_range_update_to_read_only() helper
>   gpu/drm/radeon: optimize out the case when a range is updated to read
>     only
>   gpu/drm/amdgpu: optimize out the case when a range is updated to read
>     only
>   gpu/drm/i915: optimize out the case when a range is updated to read
>     only
>   RDMA/umem_odp: optimize out the case when a range is updated to read
>     only
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.c  | 13 ++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 16 ++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mn.c      | 13 ++++++++
>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem_odp.c      | 22 +++++++++++--
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c                      |  3 +-
>  include/linux/mmu_notifier.h            | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/rdma/ib_umem_odp.h              |  1 +
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c                 |  3 +-
>  mm/huge_memory.c                        | 14 +++++----
>  mm/hugetlb.c                            | 11 ++++---
>  mm/khugepaged.c                         |  3 +-
>  mm/ksm.c                                |  6 ++--
>  mm/madvise.c                            |  3 +-
>  mm/memory.c                             | 25 +++++++++------
>  mm/migrate.c                            |  5 ++-
>  mm/mmu_notifier.c                       | 10 ++++++
>  mm/mprotect.c                           |  4 ++-
>  mm/mremap.c                             |  3 +-
>  mm/oom_kill.c                           |  3 +-
>  mm/rmap.c                               |  6 ++--
>  20 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.2
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ