linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.20 018/127] drm/amdkfd: fix interrupt spin lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190124190212.980536117@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:19:24 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 018/127] drm/amdkfd: fix interrupt spin lock

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 2383a767c0ca06f96534456d8313909017c6c8d0 ]

Vega10 has multiple interrupt rings, so this can be called from multiple
calles at the same time resulting in:

[   71.779334] ================================
[   71.779406] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[   71.779478] 4.19.0-rc1+ #44 Tainted: G        W
[   71.779565] --------------------------------
[   71.779637] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[   71.779740] kworker/6:1/120 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[   71.779832] 00000000ad761971 (&(&kfd->interrupt_lock)->rlock){?...},
at: kgd2kfd_interrupt+0x75/0x100 [amdgpu]
[   71.780058] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[   71.780115]   _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
[   71.780180]   kgd2kfd_interrupt+0x75/0x100 [amdgpu]
[   71.780248]   amdgpu_irq_callback+0x6c/0x150 [amdgpu]
[   71.780315]   amdgpu_ih_process+0x88/0x100 [amdgpu]
[   71.780380]   amdgpu_irq_handler+0x20/0x40 [amdgpu]
[   71.780409]   __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x49/0x2a0
[   71.780436]   handle_irq_event_percpu+0x30/0x70
[   71.780461]   handle_irq_event+0x37/0x60
[   71.780484]   handle_edge_irq+0x83/0x1b0
[   71.780506]   handle_irq+0x1f/0x30
[   71.780526]   do_IRQ+0x53/0x110
[   71.780544]   ret_from_intr+0x0/0x22
[   71.780566]   cpuidle_enter_state+0xaa/0x330
[   71.780591]   do_idle+0x203/0x280
[   71.780610]   cpu_startup_entry+0x6f/0x80
[   71.780634]   start_secondary+0x1b0/0x200
[   71.780657]   secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

Fix this by always using irq save spin locks.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
index e4ded890b1cb..6edaf11d69aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
@@ -688,6 +688,7 @@ void kgd2kfd_interrupt(struct kfd_dev *kfd, const void *ih_ring_entry)
 {
 	uint32_t patched_ihre[KFD_MAX_RING_ENTRY_SIZE];
 	bool is_patched = false;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!kfd->init_complete)
 		return;
@@ -697,7 +698,7 @@ void kgd2kfd_interrupt(struct kfd_dev *kfd, const void *ih_ring_entry)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&kfd->interrupt_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&kfd->interrupt_lock, flags);
 
 	if (kfd->interrupts_active
 	    && interrupt_is_wanted(kfd, ih_ring_entry,
@@ -706,7 +707,7 @@ void kgd2kfd_interrupt(struct kfd_dev *kfd, const void *ih_ring_entry)
 				     is_patched ? patched_ihre : ih_ring_entry))
 		queue_work(kfd->ih_wq, &kfd->interrupt_work);
 
-	spin_unlock(&kfd->interrupt_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kfd->interrupt_lock, flags);
 }
 
 int kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
-- 
2.19.1