linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] clk: Add comment about __of_clk_get_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190124210759.GM9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:07:59 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] clk: Add comment about __of_clk_get_by_name()
 error values

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 03:18:42PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Any other comments on this patch and patch 2/2 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/3/326)?

Was on vacations, sorry.

> > > I would start new sentence from new line (this will emphasize the
> > > possible
> > > variants)
> > >
> > >  * This is ...
> > I disagree, the explanation is specifically related to the case where the
> > function returns -EINVAL. Though this is a nit, so I'm not really bothered
> > either way.

Ah, okay. You may bear my tags on.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko