lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:07:59 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] clk: Add comment about __of_clk_get_by_name() error values On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 03:18:42PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote: > Hi, > > Any other comments on this patch and patch 2/2 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/3/326)? Was on vacations, sorry. > > > I would start new sentence from new line (this will emphasize the > > > possible > > > variants) > > > > > > * This is ... > > I disagree, the explanation is specifically related to the case where the > > function returns -EINVAL. Though this is a nit, so I'm not really bothered > > either way. Ah, okay. You may bear my tags on. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists