[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154836998080.136743.17683029101430122926@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:46:20 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.co.uk>,
PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, od@...c.me,
Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/26] clocksource: Add driver for the Ingenic JZ47xx OST
Quoting Paul Cercueil (2019-01-24 12:46:28)
>
>
> Le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 à 16:28, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> a
> écrit :
> > Quoting Guenter Roeck (2019-01-23 10:01:55)
> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:25:53PM -0300, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Le mer. 23 janv. 2019 Ã 11:31, Guenter Roeck
> >> <linux@...ck-us.net> a écrit :
> >> > >On 1/23/19 4:58 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >> > >>On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:09 PM Paul Cercueil
> >> <paul@...pouillou.net>
> >> > >>wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>From: Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>OST is the OS Timer, a 64-bit timer/counter with buffered
> >> reading.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>SoCs before the JZ4770 had (if any) a 32-bit OST; the JZ4770
> >> and
> >> > >>>JZ4780 have a 64-bit OST.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>This driver will register both a clocksource and a sched_clock
> >> to the
> >> > >>>system.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
> >> > >>>Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> >> > >>>---
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>Notes:
> >> > >>> v5: New patch
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> v6: - Get rid of SoC IDs; pass pointer to
> >> ingenic_ost_soc_info
> >> > >>>as
> >> > >>> devicetree match data instead.
> >> > >>> - Use device_get_match_data() instead of the of_*
> >> variant
> >> > >>> - Handle error of dev_get_regmap() properly
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> v7: Fix section mismatch by using
> >> > >>>builtin_platform_driver_probe()
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> v8: builtin_platform_driver_probe() does not work
> >> anymore in
> >> > >>> 4.20-rc6? The probe function won't be called. Work
> >> around
> >> > >>>this
> >> > >>> for now by using late_initcall.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >
> >> > >Did anyone notice this ? Either something is wrong with the
> >> driver, or
> >> > >with the kernel core. Hacking around it seems like the worst
> >> possible
> >> > >"solution".
> >> >
> >> > I can confirm it still happens on 5.0-rc3.
> >> >
> >> > Just to explain what I'm doing:
> >> >
> >> > My ingenic-timer driver probes with builtin_platform_driver_probe
> >> (this
> >> > works),
> >> > and then calls of_platform_populate to probe its children. This
> >> driver,
> >> > ingenic-ost, is one of them, and will fail to probe with
> >> > builtin_platform_driver_probe.
> >> >
> >>
> >> The big question is _why_ it fails to probe.
> >>
> >
> > Are you sharing the device tree node between a 'normal' platform
> > device
> > driver and something more low level DT that marks the device's backing
> > DT node as OF_POPULATED early on? That's my only guess why it's not
> > working.
>
> I do, but I clear the OF_POPULATED flag so that it is then probed as a
> normal platform device, and it's not on this driver's node but its
> parent.
>
Where do you clear the OF_POPULATED flag?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists