[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190124070503.GJ18231@xz-x1>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:05:03 +0800
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@...l.gov>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Martin Cracauer <cracauer@...s.org>,
Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@...tuozzo.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@...l.gov>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/24] mm: gup: allow VM_FAULT_RETRY for multiple
times
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:24:55AM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:57:02PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > This is the gup counterpart of the change that allows the VM_FAULT_RETRY
> > to happen for more than once.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
>
> So it would be nice to add a comment in the code and in the commit message
> about possible fault starvation (mostly due to previous patch changes) as
> if some one experience that and try to bisect it might overlook the commit.
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Jerome, can I still keep this r-b if I'm going to fix the starvation
issue you mentioned in previous patch about lock page?
Regards,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists