[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190124100209.GA8674@lem-wkst-02.lemonage>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:02:10 +0100
From: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] nfc: pn532_uart: Add NXP PN532 to devicetree docs
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 01:59:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:18:05 +0100, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> > Add a simple binding doc for the pn532.
> >
> > Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Add documentation about reg property in case of i2c
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - seperate binding doc instead of entry in trivial-devices.txt
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/nfc/pn532.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nfc/pn532.txt
> >
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Thanks for the clarification! To be clear: It was not intentional to not
add your tag. It was unknowingness.
Thanks again,
Lars
Powered by blists - more mailing lists