[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c00394ec-4817-629d-2a92-e62a7f2d31ab@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:38:58 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: sun5i: fail gracefully when clock rate is
unavailable
On 24/01/2019 09:56, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:19 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/01/2019 07:22, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> If the clock tree is not fully populated when the timer-sun5i init code
>>> is called, attempts to get the clock rate for the timer would fail and
>>> return 0.
>>>
>>> Make the init code for both clock events and clocksource check the
>>> returned clock rate and fail gracefully if the result is 0, instead of
>>> causing a divide by 0 exception later on.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 4a59058f0b09 ("clocksource/drivers/sun5i: Refactor the current code")
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>>> ---
>>
>> Applied thanks.
>
> I'm not seeing this in linux-next, nor the patch
>
> arm64: arch_timer: Workaround for Allwinner A64 timer instability
>
> Any idea where these ended up?
Yeah, I have a rough idea. They are now in linux-next via the
clockevents/next branch.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists