Message-ID: <20190124153032.GA5030@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:30:32 -0500
From:   Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To:     Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] gpu/drm/i915: optimize out the case when a range
 is updated to read only

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 02:09:12PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
> 
> This patch seems to have plenty of Cc:s, but none of the right ones :)

So sorry, i am bad with git commands.

> For further iterations, I guess you could use git option --cc to make
> sure everyone gets the whole series, and still keep the Cc:s in the
> patches themselves relevant to subsystems.

Will do.

> This doesn't seem to be on top of drm-tip, but on top of your previous
> patches(?) that I had some comments about. Could you take a moment to
> first address the couple of question I had, before proceeding to discuss
> what is built on top of that base.

It is on top of Linus tree so roughly ~ rc3 it does not depend on any
of the previous patch i posted. I still intended to propose to remove
GUP from i915 once i get around to implement the equivalent of GUP_fast
for HMM and other bonus cookies with it.

The plan is once i have all mm bits properly upstream then i can propose
patches to individual driver against the proper driver tree ie following
rules of each individual device driver sub-system and Cc only people
there to avoid spamming the mm folks :)


> 
> My reply's Message-ID is:
> 154289518994.19402.3481838548028068213@...htine-desk.ger.corp.intel.com
> 
> Regards, Joonas
> 
> PS. Please keep me Cc:d in the following patches, I'm keen on
> understanding the motive and benefits.
> 
> Quoting jglisse@...hat.com (2019-01-24 00:23:14)
> > From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> > 
> > When range of virtual address is updated read only and corresponding
> > user ptr object are already read only it is pointless to do anything.
> > Optimize this case out.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
> > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> > Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> > index 9558582c105e..23330ac3d7ea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct i915_mmu_object {
> >         struct interval_tree_node it;
> >         struct list_head link;
> >         struct work_struct work;
> > +       bool read_only;
> >         bool attached;
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -119,6 +120,7 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
> >                 container_of(_mn, struct i915_mmu_notifier, mn);
> >         struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
> >         struct interval_tree_node *it;
> > +       bool update_to_read_only;
> >         LIST_HEAD(cancelled);
> >         unsigned long end;
> >  
> > @@ -128,6 +130,8 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
> >         /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is exclusive */
> >         end = range->end - 1;
> >  
> > +       update_to_read_only = mmu_notifier_range_update_to_read_only(range);
> > +
> >         spin_lock(&mn->lock);
> >         it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, range->start, end);
> >         while (it) {
> > @@ -145,6 +149,17 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
> >                  * object if it is not in the process of being destroyed.
> >                  */
> >                 mo = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it);
> > +
> > +               /*
> > +                * If it is already read only and we are updating to
> > +                * read only then we do not need to change anything.
> > +                * So save time and skip this one.
> > +                */
> > +               if (update_to_read_only && mo->read_only) {
> > +                       it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, range->start, end);
> > +                       continue;
> > +               }
> > +
> >                 if (kref_get_unless_zero(&mo->obj->base.refcount))
> >                         queue_work(mn->wq, &mo->work);
> >  
> > @@ -270,6 +285,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >         mo->mn = mn;
> >         mo->obj = obj;
> >         mo->it.start = obj->userptr.ptr;
> > +       mo->read_only = i915_gem_object_is_readonly(obj);
> >         mo->it.last = obj->userptr.ptr + obj->base.size - 1;
> >         INIT_WORK(&mo->work, cancel_userptr);
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.17.2
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists