linux-kernel - Re: GRSec is vital to Linux security

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:22:00 +0000
From:   linuxgpletc@...chan.it
To:     "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
Cc:     Ivan Ivanov <qmastery16@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        gentoo-user@...ts.gentoo.org, freebsd-chat@...ebsd.org,
        misc@...nbsd.org, rms@....org
Subject: Re: GRSec is vital to Linux security

On 2019-01-24 15:31, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> Do you have some actual proposals / patches ?

Sue Open Source Security / Bradly Spengler for copyright infringement. 
Seek his profits as damages. I doubt you'll be able to get specific 
performance since the GPL is not a contact in this instance. (If you 
registered your copyright prior to the violation you can alternatively 
go for statutory damages + attoneys fees btw)

He is _blatantly_ violating your copyright by adding an additional 
restrictive term regarding the distribution of his non-separable 
derivative work of the linux kernel code.