[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+zfV66EZHX7psh2=r-=wDrmLLcr5PWtSzuKRNOdMR-Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:49:30 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, koen.kooi@...aro.org,
Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: dts: xilinx: ultra96: Standardize LED
labels and triggers
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 12:51 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
>
> On 21. 12. 18 3:37, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 03:12:44PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> >> For all 96Boards, the following standard is used for onboard LEDs.
> >>
> >> green:user1 default-trigger: heartbeat
> >> green:user2 default-trigger: mmc0/disk-activity(onboard-storage)
> >> green:user3 default-trigger: mmc1 (SD-card)
> >> green:user4 default-trigger: none, panic-indicator
> >> yellow:wlan default-trigger: phy0tx
> >> blue:bt default-trigger: hci0-power
> >>
> >> So lets adopt the same for Ultra96, which is one of the 96Boards
> >> CE and AI platform. Since the WLAN and BT LEDs are hardwired onboard,
> >> consolidate only User LEDs.
> >>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Any update on this patch?
>
> I am still waiting for reaction from Rob.
> We are keep trying to keep backward compatibility and this patch is
> breaking it that's why I want to know DT guys reaction on this change.
dts changes and backwards compatibility are ultimately up to the
platform maintainers. Your users can yell at you if they care. I only
ask that changes that break compatibility are documented as doing so.
Personally, I'm in favor of this change. I'd rather seem uniformity
across boards and this is just a dev board and LED functions won't
affect booting.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists