linux-kernel - Re: [v2 PATCH] rhashtable: Still do rehash when we get EEXIST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D5A6C2E7-2AB1-46D0-8876-2D6AAAA3937F@appneta.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:40:01 -0800
From:   Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@...neta.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] rhashtable: Still do rehash when we get EEXIST

On Jan 23, 2019, at 7:08 PM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:

> Thanks for catching this!
> 
> Although I think we should fix this in a different way.  The problem
> here is that the shrink cannot proceed because there was a previous
> rehash that is still incomplete.  We should wait for its completion
> and then reattempt a shrinnk should it still be necessary.
> 
> So something like this:

SGTM. 

I can't test this right now because our VM server's down after a power
 outage this evening, but I tried a similar patch that swallowed the
 -EEXIST err and even with that oversight the hashtable dodged the
reschedule loop.

- Josh