[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154835600359.136743.8585628353385883771@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:53:23 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "Input: olpc_apsp - enable the SP clock"
Quoting Dmitry Torokhov (2019-01-23 14:05:45)
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 07:22:54AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > Turns out this is not such a great idea. Once the SP clock is disabled,
> > it's not sufficient to just enable in order to bring the SP core back up.
> >
> > It seems that the kernel has no business managing this clock. Just let
> > the firmware keep it enabled.
> >
> > This reverts commit ed22cee91a88c47e564478b012fdbcb079653499.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/154783267051.169631.3197836544646625747@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
>
> OK, as clock folks say it is a bad idea it must be so. Merge though clk
> tree?
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>
Ok sure. I'll merge them through clk tree. I'll fast track it through
clk-fixes too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists