linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 068/104] loop: Fold __loop_release into loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190124190203.062416837@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:19:57 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 068/104] loop: Fold __loop_release into loop_release

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 967d1dc144b50ad005e5eecdfadfbcfb399ffff6 upstream.

__loop_release() has a single call site. Fold it there. This is
currently not a huge win but it will make following replacement of
loop_index_mutex more obvious.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/loop.c |   16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1586,12 +1586,15 @@ out:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
+static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
 {
+	struct loop_device *lo;
 	int err;
 
+	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	lo = disk->private_data;
 	if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
-		return;
+		goto unlock_index;
 
 	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
@@ -1601,7 +1604,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_dev
 		 */
 		err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
 		if (!err)
-			return;
+			goto unlock_index;
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config,
@@ -1611,12 +1614,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_dev
 	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
-}
-
-static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
-	__lo_release(disk->private_data);
+unlock_index:
 	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
 }