| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:57:11 +0530
From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>, subhashj@...eaurora.org,
cang@...eaurora.org, vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, vinholikatti@...il.com,
jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [<PATCH v1> 1/1] scsi: qcom-ufs: Add support for bus voting using
ICB framework
On 1/24/2019 5:16 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> Hi Asutosh,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> On 1/24/19 09:01, Asutosh Das wrote:
>> Adapt to the new ICB framework for bus bandwidth voting.
>
> It's actually called interconnect API or interconnect framework.
Thanks! will change it.
>
>> This requires the source/destination port ids.
>> Also this requires a tuple of values.
>>
>> The tuple is for two different paths - from UFS master
>> to BIMC slave. The other is from CPU master to UFS slave.
>> This tuple consists of the average and peak bandwidth.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>
> You can put here (below the --- line) the text from the cover letter.
> Usually people do not add separate cover letters for single patches.
Ok - will do so.
>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt | 12 ++
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 234 ++++++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.h | 20 ++
>> 3 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
>> index a99ed55..94249ef 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
>> @@ -45,6 +45,18 @@ Optional properties:
>> Note: If above properties are not defined it can be assumed that the supply
>> regulators or clocks are always on.
>>
>> +* Following bus parameters are required:
>> +interconnects
>> +interconnect-names
>
> Is the above really required? Are the interconnect bandwidth requests
> required to enable something critical to UFS functionality?
> Would UFS still work without any bandwidth scaling, although for example
> slower? Could you please clarify.
Yes - UFS will still work without any bandwidth scaling - but the
performance would be terrible.
>
>> +- Please refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/
>> + for more details on the above.
>> +qcom,msm-bus,name - string describing the bus path
>> +qcom,msm-bus,num-cases - number of configurations in which ufs can operate in
>> +qcom,msm-bus,num-paths - number of paths to vote for
>> +qcom,msm-bus,vectors-KBps - Takes a tuple <ib ab>, <ib ab> (2 tuples for 2 num-paths)
>> + The number of these entries *must* be same as
>> + num-cases.
>
> DT bindings should be submitted as a separate patch. Anyway, people
> frown upon putting configuration data in DT. Could we put this data into
> the driver as a static table instead of DT? Also maybe use ab/pb for
> average/peak bandwidth.
The ab/ib value change depending on the target - that's the reasoning
for putting it in dts file. However, I'm open to ideas as to how else to
handle this.
Agree to changing it to pb.
>
>> +
>> Example:
>> ufshc@...c598000 {
>> compatible = "jedec,ufs-1.1";
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> index 2b38db2..213e975 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>> +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
>> #include <linux/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.h>
>
> Alphabetical order?
Agreed.
>
>>
>> #include "ufshcd.h"
>> @@ -27,6 +28,10 @@
>> #define UFS_QCOM_DEFAULT_DBG_PRINT_EN \
>> (UFS_QCOM_DBG_PRINT_REGS_EN | UFS_QCOM_DBG_PRINT_TEST_BUS_EN)
>>
>> +#define UFS_DDR "ufs-ddr"
>> +#define CPU_UFS "cpu-ufs"
>
> Not sure if it's really useful to have them as #defines. Also maybe use
> "ufs-mem" instead of "ufs-ddr" to be more consistent with other users.
I can declare these as strings too - I don't have a preference.
Please let me know if you've a preference.
The reason for ufs-ddr was that it describes the path from ufs device to
ddr. Am fine with ufs-mem too.
>
>> +
>> +
>> enum {
>> TSTBUS_UAWM,
>> TSTBUS_UARM,
>> @@ -714,7 +719,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_get_pwr_dev_param(struct ufs_qcom_dev_params *qcom_param,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_MSM_BUS_SCALING
>> static int ufs_qcom_get_bus_vote(struct ufs_qcom_host *host,
>> const char *speed_mode)
>> {
>> @@ -768,24 +772,83 @@ static void ufs_qcom_get_speed_mode(struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *p, char *result)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static int ufs_qcom_get_ib_ab(struct ufs_qcom_host *host, int index,
>> + struct qcom_bus_vectors *ufs_ddr_vec,
>> + struct qcom_bus_vectors *cpu_ufs_vec)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_bus_path *usecase;
>> +
>> + if (!host->qbsd)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (index > host->qbsd->num_usecase)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + usecase = host->qbsd->usecase;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + *
>> + * usecase:0 usecase:0
>> + * ufs->ddr cpu->ufs
>> + * |vec[0&1] | vec[2&3]|
>> + * +----+----+----+----+
>> + * | ab | ib | ab | ib |
>> + * |----+----+----+----+
>> + * .
>> + * .
>> + * .
>> + * usecase:n usecase:n
>> + * ufs->ddr cpu->ufs
>> + * |vec[0&1] | vec[2&3]|
>> + * +----+----+----+----+
>> + * | ab | ib | ab | ib |
>> + * |----+----+----+----+
>> + */
>> +
>> + /* index refers to offset in usecase */
>> + ufs_ddr_vec->ab = usecase[index].vec[0].ab;
>> + ufs_ddr_vec->ib = usecase[index].vec[0].ib;
>> +
>> + cpu_ufs_vec->ab = usecase[index].vec[1].ab;
>> + cpu_ufs_vec->ib = usecase[index].vec[1].ib;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int ufs_qcom_set_bus_vote(struct ufs_qcom_host *host, int vote)
>> {
>> int err = 0;
>> + struct qcom_bus_scale_data *d = host->qbsd;
>> + struct qcom_bus_vectors path0, path1;
>> + struct device *dev = host->hba->dev;
>>
>> - if (vote != host->bus_vote.curr_vote) {
>> - err = msm_bus_scale_client_update_request(
>> - host->bus_vote.client_handle, vote);
>> - if (err) {
>> - dev_err(host->hba->dev,
>> - "%s: msm_bus_scale_client_update_request() failed: bus_client_handle=0x%x, vote=%d, err=%d\n",
>> - __func__, host->bus_vote.client_handle,
>> - vote, err);
>> - goto out;
>> - }
>> + err = ufs_qcom_get_ib_ab(host, vote, &path0, &path1);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Error: failed (%d) to get ib/ab\n",
>> + err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>>
>> - host->bus_vote.curr_vote = vote;
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Setting vote: %d: ufs-ddr: ab: %llu ib: %llu\n", vote,
>> + path0.ab, path0.ib);
>> + err = icc_set_bw(d->ufs_ddr, path0.ab, path0.ib);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Error: (%d) failed setting (%s) bus vote\n", err,
>> + UFS_DDR);
>> + return err;
>> }
>> -out:
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Setting: cpu-ufs: ab: %llu ib: %llu\n", path1.ab,
>> + path1.ib);
>> + err = icc_set(d->cpu_ufs, path1.ab, path1.ib);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Error: (%d) failed setting (%s) bus vote\n", err,
>> + CPU_UFS);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + host->bus_vote.curr_vote = vote;
>> +
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -807,6 +870,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_update_bus_bw_vote(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
>> dev_err(host->hba->dev, "%s: failed %d\n", __func__, err);
>> else
>> host->bus_vote.saved_vote = vote;
>> +
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -837,34 +901,114 @@ static int ufs_qcom_update_bus_bw_vote(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> +static struct qcom_bus_scale_data *ufs_qcom_get_bus_scale_data(struct device
>> + *dev)
>> +
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>> + struct device_node *of_node = dev->of_node;
>> + struct qcom_bus_scale_data *qsd;
>> + struct qcom_bus_path *usecase = NULL;
>> + int ret = 0, i = 0, j, num_paths, len;
>> + const uint32_t *vec_arr = NULL;
>
> Please use u32 instead of uint32_t.
Agreed.
>
>> + bool mem_err = false;
>> +
>> + if (!pdev) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Null platform device!\n");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + qsd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct qcom_bus_scale_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!qsd)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_string(of_node, "qcom,msm-bus,name", &qsd->name);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Error: (%d) Bus name missing!\n", ret);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "qcom,msm-bus,num-cases",
>> + &qsd->num_usecase);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("Error: num-usecases not found\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + usecase = devm_kzalloc(dev, (sizeof(struct qcom_bus_path) *
>> + qsd->num_usecase), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!usecase)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, "qcom,msm-bus,num-paths",
>> + &num_paths);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("Error: num_paths not found\n");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + vec_arr = of_get_property(of_node, "qcom,msm-bus,vectors-KBps", &len);
>> + if (vec_arr == NULL) {
>> + pr_err("Error: Vector array not found\n");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < qsd->num_usecase; i++) {
>> + usecase[i].num_paths = num_paths;
>> + usecase[i].vec = devm_kzalloc(dev, num_paths *
>> + sizeof(struct qcom_bus_vectors),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!usecase[i].vec) {
>> + mem_err = true;
>> + dev_err(dev, "Error: Failed to alloc mem for vectors\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < num_paths; j++) {
>> + int idx = ((i * num_paths) + j) * 2;
>> +
>> + usecase[i].vec[j].ab = (uint64_t)
>> + be32_to_cpu(vec_arr[idx]);
>> + usecase[i].vec[j].ib = (uint64_t)
>> + be32_to_cpu(vec_arr[idx + 1]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + qsd->usecase = usecase;
>> + return qsd;
>> +err:
>> + if (mem_err) {
>> + for (; i > 0; i--)
>> + kfree(usecase[i].vec);
>> + }
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>
> We wouldn't need all the above DT parsing if we add a sdm845 bandwidth
> usecase table. Could you give it a try?
Replied above - Please let me know if you've any suggestions on how else
to handle this, as it can change with targets.
>
> Thanks,
> Georgi
>
Hi Georgi - thanks for the comments.
Replied to your comments inline.
-asd
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists