[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190125205520.GA9602@embeddedor>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:55:20 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c: In function ‘resolve_default_seg’:
arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c:179:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (insn->addr_bytes == 2)
^
arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c:182:2: note: here
case -EDOM:
^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 9119d8e41f1f..8f1b2d8db4e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static int resolve_default_seg(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs, int off)
/* Need insn to verify address size. */
if (insn->addr_bytes == 2)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* fall through */
case -EDOM:
case offsetof(struct pt_regs, bx):
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists